I started it in a forum, a blog but now I have made of it. Did the whole is urgently needed.
Here are the parts that already exist in the forum.
First of all: This post was based on boredom and is directed at nobody in particular. Whoever finds typos may keep them and profitable auction.
| quote: |
| Originally ? Posted by diablo2k7 hm .... instead to spam so much, but sometimes writes NEN tutorial ... and nice to look out spelling  |
This quote me but do to something: A tutorial German language!
Sounds strange, but Sun
Let's start with capital letters.
It is very important as they can on the one change the meaning of a sentence and, second, it promotes the general legibility.
general, it means that you write anything great, what you can handle.
BUT: these include then nevertheless words such as: phosphoric acid, tiger, hammerhead, or mushroom cloud.
we restrict this wisdom so that we all large writes, which can be seen directly. But words such as air, gas or Carboniumdioxid belong.
Gee whiz, this stuff you can neither see nor touch, yet it is very important.
Very well. Noted.
For example, I'll give you complete this sentence in small letters:
"help the hungry birds"
Is this
a) "Help the hungry birds"
or
b) Help the hungry birds "?
good quality, not that the breed also ... well, who's fun.
moment - I just wrote because "[...] whom it's fun "?
Well, correct in this case. Next topic: The apostrophe.
"Saturday's, no's, home's food, Bauer'n-yard, Emma's, Thomas's" and what it all is not so.
the genitive in all honor, but who writes so and that means business, which is one shot humanely and glued depending on severity of the crime under the covers. Or booted straight into a septic tank.
my opinion.
nothing can be executed with the German language as uncreative to this unfortunate apostrophes.
He used correctly:
Once he shows the genitive, in words that already end in an S-normal volume. Those would be the endings-s,-ss,-ß,-z,-tz,-x,-ce.
latter may be a challenge, but believe me, it just is. Namely, the sound comes from the French in terms of language, who have gone before a Hau. I think.
before questions arise: the genitive is found to the question "Whose." (Whose language? Germany Sprache. Wessen Ketchup? Heinz' Ketchup.)
Jedenfalls käme es dann zu folgenden Konstellationen als Beispiel:
"Moritz' Spielzeug", "Maurice' Baguette", "Obelix' Hinkelstein" und so weiter.
Prinzip verstanden?
Macht nichts, dann lies es dir in Ruhe noch einmal durch.
Die zweite der beiden wichtigsten Verwendungen ist die Verschriftlichung der allgemeinen Umgangssprache.
Das bedeutet: Wir schreiben es so, wie wir es im Alltag sprechen, bloß richtig.
Mal ein Beispiel.
Im Hochdeutschen heißt es "Heute ist es sehr kalt."
We say in the vernacular: "Today's is freezing cold!"
It is striking that the word "it" is omitted, we only speak the "s" of it. Writing it is behind the "is" alluded "is he".
Another example:
High German: "I've had enough for today."
vernacular: "I've had enough!"
One can see that may be omitted in verbs (Tuwörter) a terminal "e". In the case in the written language takes an apostrophe his place.
At this point I can only repeat myself: Nothing hurts more than ein völlig falscher Apostroph. Da bekommt man das Bedürfnis, mit einem tiefgefrorenem Fisch, vorzugsweise einer der Gruppe der Salmoniden wegen der tollen Form, wild und unkontrolliert fluchend um sich zu prügeln. Also bitte, benutzt den Apostroh wenn, dann richtig und wenn es nur dazu ist, dem Missbrauch von Tiefkühlfisch vorzubeugen.
Nein ehrlich. Lachs steht mittlerweile auf der Liste.
So, ich hoffe, ihr verinnerlicht euch dies, natürlich wisst ihr das alles bestimmt, aber sicher ist sicher. Ich bin fertig für heute, Fortsetzung folgt vielleicht. Dann mit Anglizismen und Interpunktion.
********
Nun gut, weiter im Text.
Thema heute: Interpunktion. Für Anglizismen nehme ich mir wann anders Zeit. Interpunktion ist umfangreich. Jawohl.
nichts ist schlimmer als ein text der ohne punkt und komma geschrieben wird da man so gut wie nichts beim ersten anlauf mitkriegt viel schlimmer noch man bekommt oftmals gar nichts mit und wenn es dann auch noch so wie in diesem beispiel alles klein ist kriegt man echt einen anfall wenigstens stimmt hier wenigstens größtenteils die rechtschreibung aber wenn die fehlt ist vollends schluss
Wenn ich so einen Text lesen muss, klappen sich mir die Fußnägel einzeln hoch, then scroll down and click.
In case I do not even go further, last time I had already stepped wide. But what must necessarily be present happens to be the punctuation mark. My example was just a taste - it's much worse. There are definitely professionals who vehemently insist on their individuality (uniqueness), by contrast, strictly refuse to use the space bar. I'll spare you the example.
the point.
It marks the end of a sentence. And only you can see this, a similar structure in the figures more than three digits.
Then it is not a point sondern ein "Tausendertrennzeichen". Ehrlich!
Es gibt auch Varianten, da packen es manche Leute einfach mal auf einen senkrechten Strich, das nennen wir dann ein "i". Ganz Hartgesottene zieren ab und an auch ein a, o oder u damit. Das sieht dann so aus: ä, ö, ü.
Das ist bei weitem noch nicht alles! Es gibt noch ein viel ausgefalleneres Völkchen, ich nenne sie einfach mal "Franzosen", die tun diese Punkte auch auf ein e. Und tun >zwei <>
Zugegeben, ich schweife gerade ein wenig vom Thema ab, um über Franzosen herzuziehen, aber ich hoffe, es veranschaulicht meinen Gedankengang. Ein Punkt gehört an das Ende eines Satzes.
Danach schreibt man groß weiter. Aber nur den ersten Buchstaben danach, verstanden? Es sei denn, ein Wort ist ein Nomen (Namenwort), siehe Kapitel eins (1) für mehr Information.
Genug des Textes, wir warten doch sowieso nur auf Beispiele:
"Ich habe Hunger. Die ganze Zeit schon."
"Peter stinkt. Die Sau."
Dann gibt es das Komma. Mindestens so wichtig wie der Punkt, wobei unser geliebtes Komma noch häufiger vernachlässigt wird als der Punkt.
Was habt ihr bloß gegen dieses arme, kleine Gebilde? Es will euch doch nur helfen, eure Sätze übersichtlicher und verständlicher zu machen!
Also, seit lieb und gebt ihm eine Chance.
Überlegt doch nur, wo wir ohne das Komma wären!
Jemand in diesem Forum hat mal ein tolles Beispiel dafür gebracht, das werde ich hier einmal aufschreiben.
(Meinen Dank an denjenigen, dessen Namen ich nicht mehr zu dem Beispiel weiß)
Zuerst ohne das Komma:
"Begnadige nicht hängen."
Nun zwei Möglichkeiten für unser Komma:
"Begnadige, nicht hängen."
"Begnadige nicht, hängen."
Da wird sich der Angeklagte aber Wondering if we move him suddenly, the comma ...
What is important to recognize so easily can be a comma, not only encourage the reader, it can sometimes completely change the meaning of a sentence! So it does not help to sit down at a text and to distribute the comma with a salt shaker on the line, not by far!
Let me therefore explain how you use it.
Yes, you think your part, I do it anyway!
A comma separates main clause of sentences. You might ask yourselves, what is meant by again. If not, I do not even care now.
A fundamental theorem a sentence that can stand on its own. He is always, and I mean ALWAYS a subject [noun (name word)] and a predicate [verb (Tuwort)]. So, a minimum total of two words. Too bad that even the remains of some on line ...
Well, whatever. Here is an example.
Peter stinks. "
"blooming flowers."
Television stupid. "
By now it should be clear what I mean.
Then there's the subordinate clause. It is sometimes abbreviated as "NS". This is evil in this context, legitimate and NOT.
He is never alone. That would be extremely abundant sound stupid.
"that it was good."
"that he wanted."
You see, what I mean.
I hope so.
why you put such a clause to a main clause. Then he is no longer so alone and also results in mind.
I provided my pictures were so times with a main clause. And a comma.
"And he saw that it was good."
"This is the gift that he wanted."
In addition, there are many other ways but that would probably break the frame. Another chapter in itself.
Let us note simply that a comma separates sentences. Whatever kind it may be now.
Furthermore there is a question mark (?). It looks as if someone put a stunted two-to a point. Must have been a Frenchman who do sometimes quite strange things. Especially with points. And grammar. And spelling. And the accents. And with cars.
Well, we should allow this
A question mark is, as the name suggests, beyond a question.
That's right, behind it!
Not before, or the middle of it, but behind it.
like a point.
Just behind a question.
Do I really write down examples of what is a question?
The previous record was. All right.
"Have you ever 'nen €?
This question we hear quite often, usually in pedestrian zones.
"Yes, spin I do now?"
This question is heard more often at home or in schools. It is a so-called yes / no question, so you can either answer "Yes" or "No". (Note: Wider Precht not your teachers or Parents. That's rude!)
"How many times do I tell you that?"
heard increasingly in schools. Question of quantity. Keep it small so your comparison is not accidentally bite into the edge of the table.
"Are you stupid?"
This is not really a question more of a call. This question first requires the estimation of your opponent. Compares it with you. Is it big on two feet, the legs take in hand. No, you do not huddled together and take the legs in the hand, run.
he is a head shorter than her, then replies with the question: "Do you need Anger? "
The rest is then given.
Very well, I hope you understand up to here everything.
am Next, I will be the exclamation mark (!). That thing looks like a vertical bar, as have the "i", only with the point _darunter_.
must have done that a Frenchman invented. They do crazy things. Especially with points. ... And
Yes, all right.
So if it turns you directly to someone who is using this character
examples.
"You stink!"
"I do not like you! You ass! "
course, one must not always be so ugly:
"I love you!" or "I find this good!" can also be provided with the punctuation.
You see, on closer sight it that the rates could also end with a period.
No, really see, even once more closely.
Rather still serves as a direct address to the Exclamation nämnlich to emphasize a specific set.
No, you can not emphasize such issues.
Also, no subordinate clauses.
So, let the text sink a little. Or read it to you again by. Or print it out and frame it on you.
Harten learning all of you maybe even out of it!
Next Topics: Anglicisms (at last) and Kanak Sprak, age, yo.
********
anticipation one should feel someone mentioned: self-blame!
'Kanaksprak'. This acronym was created to designate the local vernacular groups, which some call 'wogs'. As can be it is not difficult, this name is derived from the words 'wogs' and 'voice' from.
are meant solely to foreign nationals of Turkish origin with a migration background, but now the term a completely own language style.
Well now, enough of etymology.
talk Let examples of old.
"Hey old go, you Aldi or what age?"
"Hey old, I do make knives, old!"
"old age swear!"
"Dude, what's old?"
This is to pay special attention to pronunciation. Formations such as "ch" and in some cases, sibilants (see be the final chapter for more information) as the High German "sch" is employed.
striking addition to both the beginning and at the end of the sentence the word "age" is. An early set times and the variation "Hey old. These are the surest signs that one will again zugeschwallt on 'Kanaksprak'. Furthermore, even the phrase "old age swear" to hear. As fast as speak it, or when the bonds that attach to the debate on the day, I'm not sure if there ever commas belong. What the heck. In any case, this sentence seems to have different meanings. First, it can serve the special emphasis. Here is an example for easier reading in a phonetic notation:
"Hey old swear, old
table've seen mixed three-BMW, age,
had so fat rims,
swear old, my white sneakers have mirrored Sische full-fat, old!
Swear old! "
The "swear" old "seems in this case the highly polished alloy wheels can be explicitly brought to the fore. In addition, here is another, linguistic feature can be seen: As the spokesman of the 'Kanaksprak' to struggle through to give connected text on its own, must be a sentence, which reads a sentence that ended with "old" does not begin with another "old". The first sentence of the text but not always.
Another possibility is that the phrase "age swear, old" as Füllsatz serves to bridge temporary mental blocks or resolve. For example, reported the spokesman for anything and there "he loses the thread. Such situations are often filled with a "swear" old ". Otherwise, the speaker began to stutter, which sounds more pathetic. Of course, here in variations possible, often coupled with insults and insults of the family. This accepted among the speakers well and stimulate further discussions on where quite strong arguments can be used. One may think much about the speaker, but a certain amount of repartee can not deny them.
we come to another word. "Lan". Principle can be extended to the word "lan" say the same thing as to the phrase "swear" old ". In the form of "Lan, old!" It can also as a filler word and / or Füllsatz be used and as emphasis. Whether it is used "swear" or "lan", depends on gender, moon phase and humidity.
now be added, however future use. It can also be used as a question word or an expression of astonishment. If you as a speaker of this dialect from the Pythagorean theorem and Ohm's Law, he says, at first sight "technically Lan? Pack's old!" with the solution of the problem then depends on the educational level of the speaker. This may be fundamentally different way within the group of 'Kanaksprak'-party. After the cliche is this relatively low, special school, middle school, nursery. Certainly can, however, higher education standards are, special school, secondary school or higher. Although they remain in their dialect, but certainly a kind of general education. Here is an example of 'Kanaksprak' on higher Level:
"Hey old as war and severally from this chain, old?"
"Dude, what am white and severally, severally Houdini or something old?"
"age, three slow, as is faster, old?"
"old man, severally motor vehicle mechanic or long what?"
"Hey out old war full of homework electronically, lan"
"Lan old, you have no respect for the binomial formula swear, old!"
I think these examples illustrate my thoughts. falls
The first two of the three examples also the extension "or what" to. It has no meaning, it is just the good flow of language and is a stylistic device in question sets.
striking feature of the 'Kanaksprak' is that the use of this dialect is the same for both sexes. Really interesting is in the following examples:
"Dude, listen to me go on the bag, lan!"
"Lan old son your Mudda you H% $ s swear, old!"
"Dude, severally tear 'eggs sporadically long, old!"
When you read all of my time now examples given off is also very happy that the article (Of which, the, a, a) is omitted. In contrast to civilized forms of communication are articles (the, the, the, a, a) is required in 'Kanaksprak' not, in most cases even grammatically incorrect.
This should suffice for now. I go straight namely the ideas. Thanks for reading. On Anglicisms I just am not in the mood, tired.
Next time: "Anglicisms (promise!).
Then I'm going to make everyday filth, whether in or out of Kemie Kina arise. Best out there, yes.
for the original: http://www.silkroadboard.de/thread.php?threadid=3040
